Meanwhile with Hexagon moving around the workspace is simple and elegant. That alone made me ask each time "where's the improvement?" as it looked the same as version as 2.46 nine years ago. Every time I'd install the latest version, fire it up, I saw that same clunky display that required using the keyboard just to move about the workspace. I tried Blender a number of times each time after I was told the UI was improved. They are both free, give each a try.ĮDIT 2: I was typing at the same time as FSMDesigns and dreamfarmer. Anyway, you might be one of the people for whom Blender makes more sense than Hexagon. There is probably a better word than superimposes. However, this is a known issue, and there is a Blender initiative called Blender for Artists, which superimposes a more userfriendly interface. Once you become an expert in Blender, you will be able to customize its UI, but that doesn't do you much good when you are a beginner. For me, Hexagon's UI is more intuitive so is easier to learn. in Hexagon than Blender.Ĥ) Reactions to user interface is a personal thing. You may find that you not only prefer Blender's modeling to Hexagon, but that you prefer Blender's other features to Studio.Ģ) Blender has ongoing active development so expect Blender to get more features and capabilities at a faster rate than Hexagon.ģ) Hexagon has a bridge to Daz Studio so it is more convenient to make morphs, make small adjustments to objects to match poses, etc. Blender has rigging, rendering, and other capabilities in addition to modeling. 1) Blender is much more of a full 3D suite than Hexagon.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |